June 27, 2005

The Progressive Progressing of Progress as it Progresses Promisingly

MR. RUSSERT: But if we only have three Iraqi battalions that are fully combat ready and we need 107 for us to, in fact, have our exit strategy of bringing our troops home, we are in for a very long haul.

SEC'Y RUMSFELD: Well, we're going to have, I think something in the neighborhood 200,000 in October, people in security forces when the constitution and the elections take place.

MR. RUSSERT: How many of those will be these combat-ready battalions?

SEC'Y RUMSFELD: Well, you can't do it that way. You simply have to sit down and say, "What are you trying to achieve with what types of units, and where are they in their progress?" And the answer is, they're progressing every week, every month, to a greater degree of sophistication. The biggest problems are not numbers. The biggest problems are the ministries, which are weak, and the chains of command down through those and the linkages between the police and the military forces, because they have to work together if they are going to repress this insurgency. And it's--most people are focusing on the metrics, the hard numbers. I would say the soft things, the ministries, the chains of command are considerably more important.

and still nowhere is the "progress" measured in finite detail or better yet, terms of tangible success.

Posted by kerry at June 27, 2005 08:39 PM | TrackBack
Comments

He sounds like Wally from Dilbert giving a status report. He's accomplished absolutely nothing but can't admit it, so he gives an exegesis on the philosophical theory of what "progress" means.

Posted by: dave at June 28, 2005 04:54 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?