August 21, 2006

Civics Lesson for the Underqualified

Q Mr. President, the federal ruling yesterday that declared your terrorist surveillance program unconstitutional -- the judge wrote that it was never the intent of the framers to give the President such unfettered control. How do you respond, sir, to opponents who say that this ruling is really the first nail in the coffin of your administration's legal strategy in the war on terror?

THE PRESIDENT: I would say that those who herald this decision simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live. You might remember last week working with the -- with people in Great Britain, we disrupted a plot. People were trying to come and kill people.

This country of ours is at war, and we must give those whose responsibility it is to protect the United States the tools necessary to protect this country in a time of war. The judge's decision was a -- I strongly disagree with that decision, strongly disagree. That's why I instructed the Justice Department to appeal immediately, and I believe our appeals will be upheld.

I made my position clear about this war on terror. And by the way, the enemy made their position clear yet again when we were able to stop them. And I -- the American people expect us to protect them, and therefore I put this program in place. We believe -- strongly believe it's constitutional.

And if al Qaeda is calling in to the United States, we want to know why they're calling. And so I made my position clear. It would be interesting to see what other policymakers -- how other policymakers react.

Um, no.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

When terror reigns supreme and fear is the tool of the powerful, how again is it that we win? When the rights afforded to us under the Constitution, which we hold dear, are eroded under the guise of safety we admit failure outright. We undermine our credibility to the world as the paragons of freedom when we allow threats to so drastically impact our lives, our liberty and our pursuit of happiness.

Bush's inability to fully grasp the concept that he works for us and the nation's willful subservience to his crimal ineptitude stands a greater chance of weakening this nation internally than any external threat of violence ever will.

Posted by kerry at August 21, 2006 03:22 AM
Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?